Miss Mystery Lady

Thurga. 20. Canadian. Deaf. Thank you for following me! Enjoy my blog! Ask me anything and I won't bite :)


Ask me anything  
Reblogged from nevergoingtobesaneagain

nevergoingtobesaneagain:

mannnnnnnnn young leo gets me everytime, no leonardo dicaprio in general gets me everytime

(via waldidneyworl)

Reblogged from scotsmcall

(Source: scotsmcall, via smellofvanilla)

Reblogged from crispy--christy
crispy—christy:

Torstein Horgmo P: Ryan Anderson

crispy—christy:

Torstein Horgmo P: Ryan Anderson

Reblogged from etornal
calms:

etornal:

Beach boardwalks are cool by etornal

● vintage & indie blog ●

calms:

etornal:

Beach boardwalks are cool by etornal

● vintage & indie blog 

(via smellofvanilla)

Reblogged from crispy--christy
crispy—christy:

Scotty James P: Zach Hooper

crispy—christy:

Scotty James P: Zach Hooper

Reblogged from highkeygay

highkeygay:

wake up open the curtains

image

take a shower then dry my hair

image

come down stairs ready for breakfast

image

greet the mailman

image

(via the-absolute-funniest-posts)

Reblogged from surftagram
surftagram:

Shane Dorian: about to take on the heavyweight champ◼️ 📷@patstacyphoto via Instagram on Surftagram.com
Follow the Facebook Page!

surftagram:

Shane Dorian: about to take on the heavyweight champ◼️ 📷@patstacyphoto via Instagram on Surftagram.com

Follow the Facebook Page!

(via aspworldtour)

Reblogged from thearticsoul
Reblogged from urhajos
Reblogged from generalbooty

generalbooty:

yeah so i slept with this dude last night and idk we were chatting a bit  during the sexy time and for some reason his birthday came up and i was like “wait 25th of september? DUDE me TOO, wtf thats such a coincidence” and he was like “really? we have the same birthday? are u fuckin with me?” and i just looked down at his penis literally inside my vagina and was like “well technically yeah” and he was like haha nice one and high fived me

(via waldidneyworl)

Reblogged from thebirdsareasleep
Reblogged from heyfunniest

Reblogged from lospaziobianco

kripke-is-my-king:

snaileggs:

voxlunch:

camwoodstock:

shaggy2pope:

grimandhopeless:

These are all extremely fair points

the first one especially speaks to me on a spiritual level

the last one is the most true shit ever

boys get the good shit

girls get “sexy ___”

whats next “sexy object”

because that’s what people are seeing girls as

Windmill slam reblog

But sometimes you want that sexy powerful character so girls can be like “hell fucking yeah she’s hot and can kick ass and I can do the same” like wonder woman

you can be sexy and powerful without being unrealistic

(Source: lospaziobianco, via waldidneyworl)

Reblogged from nimstrz
tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

(Source: nimstrz, via spoicey)

Reblogged from mymodernmet